The deliberate no-list.
We've turned down more new business in the last year than most agencies pitched for. Why saying no is operationally connected to the long-tenure compounding model, and what specifically goes on the deliberate no-list.
Six engagement shapes we deliberately decline
1. Globally-distributed agency network slots
"We need a single global agency partner, with one office in each major market." We refer those to globally-distributed agency networks. Australian-only is a structural specialism, not a coverage limitation; trying to be the AU office of a global pitch breaks the operating model.
2. Generalist briefs across six unrelated verticals
"We're a holding company with brands in healthcare, fintech, education, beauty, hospitality and B2B SaaS. We'd like one agency relationship across all of them." We refer those to generalist full-service agencies. Vertical-deep specialism doesn't apply usefully across six unrelated verticals.
3. Percentage-of-revenue performance fees
"We'll pay you a percentage of revenue you generate." Beware the perverse-incentive trap. Agency optimises for top-line growth even where margin economics don't justify it. We prefer flat retainer structures with transparent management fees on ad spend at cost. The maths is cleaner, the incentive structure is honest.
4. Six-month-and-out trial engagements
"We'd like to do a six-month trial to see how it goes." We don't structure trials. Every retainer is month-to-month, every month is a trial that the engagement either renews or doesn't. The trial framing usually signals a buyer who hasn't internalised that month-to-month is what month-to-month means.
5. Briefs that require specialist depth we don't have
"We're a Magento store with a complex catalogue at annual revenue." We don't run Magento, we run Shopify and WooCommerce. We refer Magento engagements to Magento specialists. Pretending to have capability we don't is how short-tenure cycles start.
6. Briefs from buyers who can't articulate the outcome
"We need someone to do marketing for us, we're not sure what kind." If after a 30-minute call we still can't articulate what success looks like in business outcomes, we politely decline. The engagement has nowhere to compound from.
Why this protects the long-tenure model
Three reasons saying no compounds:
- Senior-strategist time is the constrained resource. Bad-fit engagements consume senior-strategist time without producing tenure renewal. Saying no protects the bench's capacity for engagements that will compound.
- Bad-fit clients churn faster. The economics of a 6-month-and-out churn cycle is worse than the economics of declining the engagement upfront. The decline is the cleaner trade.
- The reference economy compounds. Every long-tenure client is a reference for the next long-tenure client. Bad-fit engagements that ended badly aren't references; they're risks. Saying no upstream protects the reference economy.
For brands evaluating
If we decline an engagement, we'll tell you specifically why. We'll usually be able to point you toward an agency that's a better fit (single-discipline boutique for one-discipline briefs, generalist full-service for breadth-led engagements, Magento specialists for Magento, globally-distributed networks for global-coverage briefs).
If you suggest a structure that's on the deliberate no-list (percentage-of-revenue fees, six-month trials, globally-distributed network slots), we'll explain why the structure doesn't fit our operating model. Sometimes we adjust; sometimes we politely refer.
Read more:
Want a fit-test conversation?
Thirty-minute call. We'll tell you whether we're a fit by the end of the call. If we're not, we'll usually be able to point you to an agency that is.
Book a Discovery